StandingHeritage sites, treaties and cases
← Casebook

International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg: Judgment of 30 September and 1 October 1946 on the plunder of public and private property and works of art in occupied territories

Tribunal case · International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), established by the London Agreement of 8 August 1945

1945-10-18 (Indictment lodged) – 1946-10-01 (Judgment pronounced 30 September and 1 October 1946)

Summary

The International Military Tribunal sat at Nuremberg to try the major German war criminals. Article 6(b) of its Charter listed "plunder of public or private property" among war crimes, and Count Three of the Indictment (lodged 18 October 1945) charged the defendants with war crimes including a section titled "Plunder of Public and Private Property". In its Judgment of 30 September and 1 October 1946 the Tribunal stated that "a wholesale seizure was made of art treasures, furniture, textiles and similar articles in all the invaded countries" and described the work of the Einsatzstab Rosenberg in seizing cultural treasures. Of Rosenberg it found that he "is responsible for a system of organised plunder of both public and private property throughout the invaded countries of Europe" and that he "is guilty on all four counts". The Judgment also made findings on plunder or pillage in respect of Goering and Seyss-Inquart. This entry covers only the plunder findings; the Judgment's wider findings on the defendants are not summarised.

Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project text, read via a Britannica-hosted mirror (cdn.britannica.com/primary_source/avalon)

Legal basis

The Charter (annexed to the London Agreement of 8 August 1945) gave the Tribunal power to try persons for, among other things, war crimes. Article 6(b) defines war crimes as "violations of the laws or customs of war" and says such violations "shall include, but not be limited to" a list that includes "plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity". In the section of the Judgment on the law relating to war crimes, the Tribunal cited Articles 46, 50, 52 and 56 of the Hague Convention of 1907 (the page read does not cite Article 47), stated that the crimes defined by Article 6(b) were already recognised as war crimes under international law, and stated that by 1939 the Convention's rules were recognised by all civilised nations as "declaratory of the laws and customs of war"; it also said that individual liability for such violations was "too well settled to admit of argument". The Indictment's Count Three, section on plunder, cited "particularly Articles 46 to 56 inclusive of the Hague Regulations, 1907". The text of the Hague Regulations themselves was not read for this entry.

Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project text, read via a Britannica-hosted mirror (cdn.britannica.com/primary_source/avalon)

Outcome

In the Judgment of 30 September and 1 October 1946: (1) The Tribunal stated that "a wholesale seizure was made of art treasures, furniture, textiles and similar articles in all the invaded countries", that the Einsatzstab Rosenberg's work developed into "a project for the seizure of cultural treasures", and that "In many of the occupied countries private collections were robbed, libraries were plundered, and private houses were pillaged." (2) Rosenberg: the Tribunal stated he "is responsible for a system of organised plunder of both public and private property throughout the invaded countries of Europe", that as of 14 July 1944 more than 21,903 art objects had been seized by the Einsatzstab in the West, and that he is "guilty on all four counts". (3) Goering: the Tribunal found him guilty on all four counts; the Judgment states that he "was the active authority in the spoliation" of conquered territory. The Goering section as read does not mention works of art or the Einsatzstab. (4) Seyss-Inquart: the Tribunal stated that in the Netherlands "there was widespread pillage of public and private property", given "colour of legality" by his regulations, and found him guilty under Counts Two, Three and Four (not guilty on Count One). (5) Frank: the proceedings record a finding of not guilty on Count One and guilty on Counts Three and Four; the Frank section of the Judgment was not read for plunder findings. (6) Sentences: a mirror of the official proceedings volume records death by hanging for Goering, Rosenberg, Frank and Seyss-Inquart. The Judgment does not, in the sections read, attribute any single conviction to the plunder of cultural property alone.

Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Mazal Library (archived copy hosted at phdn.org)

Timeline

  1. 29 January 1940
    Rosenberg designated by Hitler

    The Judgment states that "The defendant Rosenberg was designated by Hitler on the 29th January 1940" as head of a Centre for National Socialist Ideological and Educational Research, and that thereafter the organisation known as the "Einsatzstab Rosenberg" conducted its operations on a very great scale. The Judgment says it was originally designed for a research library and "developed into a project for the seizure of cultural treasures."

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library)

  2. 1 March 1942
    Further decree on searching cultural establishments

    The Judgment states that on 1 March 1942 Hitler issued a further decree authorising Rosenberg to search libraries, lodges and cultural establishments, and that Rosenberg's activities were thereafter extended to the occupied countries.

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library)

  3. 14 July 1944
    Einsatzstab seizure figure cited in the Judgment

    In the section on Rosenberg the Judgment states that as of 14 July 1944 "more than 21,903 art objects, including famous paintings and museum pieces," had been seized by the Einsatzstab in the West.

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library)

  4. 8 August 1945
    London Agreement and Charter

    The Judgment begins its account with the Agreement of 8 August 1945 establishing the Tribunal, to which the Charter is annexed. Article 6(b) of the Charter lists "plunder of public or private property" among the violations of the laws or customs of war.

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library)

  5. 18 October 1945
    Indictment lodged

    The Judgment states the Indictment was lodged against the defendants in Berlin on 18 October 1945; the trial record of the first day gives the same date. Count Three of the Indictment charged war crimes, including a section headed "Plunder of Public and Private Property" that cites Articles 46 to 56 of the Hague Regulations (1907).

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project text, read via a Britannica-hosted mirror (cdn.britannica.com/primary_source/avalon)

  6. 20 November 1945
    Trial begins

    The Judgment states the trial began on 20 November 1945; the proceedings volume records the first day as Tuesday, 20 November 1945.

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library)

  7. 30 September 1946
    Reading of the Judgment begins

    On the 217th day of the trial the President announced that the Judgment would be read. The Judgment is dated 30 September and 1 October 1946.

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library)

  8. 1 October 1946
    Verdicts and sentences

    The proceedings record guilty verdicts on all four counts for Goering and Rosenberg, and for Frank on Counts Three and Four; the Seyss-Inquart section of the Judgment finds him guilty under Counts Two, Three and Four. A mirror of the official volume gives the sentence for Goering, Rosenberg, Frank and Seyss-Inquart as death by hanging.

    Sources: The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Avalon Project, Yale Law School (Lillian Goldman Law Library), The Mazal Library (archived copy hosted at phdn.org)

Connected pages

Sources

Last checked October 15, 2026 · Approved by Harry Disley on October 15, 2026