StandingHeritage sites, treaties and cases
← All sites

Bam and its Cultural Landscape

Asia, Iran · Cultural site · UNESCO World Heritage property #1208

Moderate ConcernConfidence: Developingas of October 15, 2026

Significance

Bam is a fortified desert oasis town in Kerman Province on the southern edge of the Iranian high plateau. UNESCO describes its origins in the Achaemenid period (6th to 4th centuries BC) and its heyday between the 7th and 11th centuries, when it was a crossroads on Silk Road trade routes. The property includes the Arg-e Bam citadel, a medieval mud-built town and qanat underground irrigation systems that UNESCO says still function. It was inscribed in 2004 under criteria (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v), shortly after the December 2003 earthquake, with a minor boundary modification inscribed in 2007.

Current Status Rationale

Historical damage is documented in the site's record, but the current classification is based on present conditions and the most recent credible evidence. The 2003 earthquake destroyed much of the citadel and town, and the property was on the Danger List from 2004 until the Committee removed it in June 2013 after finding the corrective measures complete. That history is preserved in events[]. The present picture rests on thinner evidence than for most sites: UNESCO's file lists no state of conservation report after 2015 and no Committee decision on the property's condition after 2015 (only a 2023 note recording boundary clarifications), and the most recent condition assessment is the State Party's own 2023 periodic report, which states that authenticity, integrity and Outstanding Universal Value are intact while acknowledging an inadequate budget, a partially adequate management plan, and drought (and, in its earthquake entry, earlier-cycle ratings of seismic risk) as continuing factors. These are chronic, monitored pressures rather than an acute emergency. The 2026 war in Iran is the main reason for caution: it affects the country and has damaged other World Heritage properties in Iran, but none of the sources read documents any strike, damage or fighting at Bam. Confidence is Developing rather than Supported because the property-specific evidence is mostly dated (2013-2015) or self-reported (2023), no independent source on Bam's condition during 2026 was found, and the conflict's current state could not be checked. Confidence does not change the status.

Conservation or other pressures are documented, but without imminent risk to the site. The situation is actively changing and evidence is still emerging.

Threat Categories

Natural Disaster

Seismic risk is a standing threat. The 26 December 2003 earthquake is the defining event in the property's record (see events[]): an AFP report gave a death toll of 26,000 to 32,000 citing 'various estimates', and the 2023 periodic report states that it collapsed sections of the Governor's Quarters and the upper defence walls. In the same report's earthquake entry (section 4.11.2), the text read shows the earlier Cycle 2 (2011) answer as relevant, negative, current, potential, inside and outside the property; the 2023 selections and the factors summary table did not appear in the text read, so a current State Party rating of earthquake risk was not confirmed. The 2011 joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS mission, which recorded that the Desired State of Conservation had not yet been achieved, recommended that the State Party consider a research centre on seismic-resistant earthen architecture. The sources read do not quantify the property's present seismic vulnerability or describe a current seismic monitoring or retrofit programme, so this entry records an acknowledged hazard rather than a measured level of risk.

First identified: December 26, 2003 — Date of the 2003 earthquake. Seismic hazard in the region is long-standing; the periodic report's earthquake entry shows the earlier Cycle 2 answer as a current and potential factor.

Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre (State Party periodic report), UNESCO World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS, AFP, republished by Young Journalists Club (YJC)

Conservation / Structural

Reconstruction and management were the central issues in UNESCO's record. The October 2011 mission (src_10) found debris removal at the citadel about 97% complete, 11 of 15 components still needing full or partial conservation work, a heavy steel and concrete retaining structure at the Governor's Seat tower that the Committee had not approved and the mission considered a threat to authenticity, and illegal settlement and a buffer-zone gas station as encroachment problems. In Decision 37 COM 7A.31 (2013) the Committee found the corrective measures completed and removed the property from the Danger List, but noted it remains vulnerable and recommended a revised Management Plan with visitor management, control of illegal construction and protection of the buffer zone, consistent restoration guidelines balancing conservation with authenticity and integrity, and continued site security. In 2015 (39 COM 7B.93) the Committee noted with satisfaction the measures taken at Bam (a separate paragraph of the omnibus decision encourages both States Parties concerned to continue conservation efforts); the Secretariat's 2015 assessment, as summarised on UNESCO's page, said no further short-term reporting was needed. The most recent property-specific document in UNESCO's file is the 2023 periodic report, in which the State Party states that authenticity and integrity have been preserved and Outstanding Universal Value maintained, but also that the management plan (2008-2017) is only partially adequate, the available budget is inadequate for basic management needs, and coordination among administrative bodies could be improved. It also lists, as State Party responses, informal housing on the city's outskirts, with planned relocation in stages with local consent, and illegal construction and excavation as declining. How much of the citadel's reconstruction remains incomplete today was not established: the most recent figure found is a 2013 statement, relayed by AFP, from the head of Iran's heritage organisation that roughly 80 percent of the reconstruction had been completed.

First identified: Not established — Chronic post-earthquake reconstruction and management challenges documented from 2004 onward; no single start date applies.

Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre (State Party periodic report), UNESCO World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS, AFP, republished by Hurriyet Daily News

Environmental / Climate

The 2023 periodic report (a State Party document) states that droughts over the last 20 years have had a negative impact on local people's quality of life, that reduced rainfall has lowered groundwater levels, that contamination of qanat water has been observed and is being monitored, and that sporadic fires occur in limited areas during hot summers. It recommends considering a comprehensive drought management plan. No independent source read quantifies these effects on the heritage fabric, so this is recorded as a chronic, self-reported pressure on the cultural landscape (qanats and agriculture) rather than as documented damage to the monuments.

First identified: Not established — Chronic; the periodic report refers to droughts 'of the last 20 years' without a single start date.

Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre (State Party periodic report)

Armed Conflict

Regional context only. According to Al Jazeera (17 March 2026), a war began on 28 February 2026 when the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran. AP (via PBS, 12 March 2026) reported that UNESCO had verified damage at at least four locations in Iran: Golestan Palace in Tehran, Chehel Sotoun Palace and the Jame Mosque in Isfahan, and buildings near the Khorramabad Valley prehistoric sites. Cultural Property News (5 May 2026) reported that Iranian authorities say more than 130 historical sites have been damaged; that figure is the authorities' and was not independently verified here. None of the sources read mentions Bam, Arg-e Bam or the Bam area as damaged or targeted. Al Jazeera, citing Iran's Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts, also lists reported damage to sites in several other provinces (including Kurdistan, Kermanshah, Bushehr and Ilam) but does not mention Kerman Province or Bam. One report (Trend, 10 March 2026) attributes to Rahman Jalali, Deputy Governor of Kerman Province, the statement that two passenger aircraft were destroyed when an airport in Kerman Province, which the report does not name, was struck by the United States and Israel; it does not mention Bam and it was not established whether this was near the property. The status of hostilities as of October 2026 could not be checked in this pass.

First identified: February 28, 2026 — Date the war began according to Al Jazeera. This is a regional threat; no source read documents military activity at the property.

Sources: Associated Press, via PBS NewsHour, Al Jazeera, Cultural Property News, Trend News Agency

Historical Timeline

  1. 2003-12-26
    Earthquake devastates Bam and the Arg-e Bam citadel

    An AFP report gave the 26 December 2003 earthquake death toll as 26,000 to 32,000, citing 'various estimates'. The 2023 periodic report states that the earthquake collapsed sections of the Governor's Quarters and the upper defence walls and destroyed many people's buildings, and that much of the lost fabric came from modern restorations, and that materials at the older levels are well preserved and have now been revealed.

    Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre (State Party periodic report), AFP, republished by Young Journalists Club (YJC)

  2. 2004
    Property inscribed on the World Heritage List and, simultaneously, on the Danger List

    UNESCO records that Bam and its Cultural Landscape was inscribed in 2004 and placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger at the same time, following the earthquake.

    Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre

  3. 2011-10
    Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission

    A mission on 16-22 October 2011 found that the Desired State of Conservation had not been achieved and did not recommend removal from the Danger List at that time (it suggested the tenth anniversary of the earthquake as a possible target date). It reported about 97% of citadel debris cleared, 11 of 15 components still needing full or partial conservation work, heavy steel and concrete retaining structures at two towers (the Governor's Seat tower and tower 46), of which the report says the Committee did not approve the Governor's Seat structure, and encroachment problems.

    Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS

  4. 2013-06
    Committee removes Bam from the List of World Heritage in Danger

    (UNESCO's news item is dated 17 June 2013; the decision page gives only the year.) At its 37th session in Phnom Penh, the Committee (Decision 37 COM 7A.31) found the remaining corrective measures from the 2011 mission completed and the desired state of conservation met, and removed the property from the Danger List. It noted the property remains vulnerable and asked for an updated report by 1 February 2015.

    Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre

  5. 2013-12-25
    Ten years on, the citadel is only partly rebuilt

    AFP reported that ten years after the earthquake only part of the citadel was rebuilt, with scaffolding supporting much of the site and gaps in outer walls. Reconstruction project manager Afshin Ebrahimi was quoted as saying 'Bam will never be rebuilt exactly the way it was'. A separate AFP report dated 26 December 2013 quoted Mohammad Ali Najafi, head of Iran's heritage organisation, saying roughly 80 percent of the reconstruction had been completed and that the citadel would be rebuilt over the next two or three years (that timeframe attributed to Fars news agency; the article names no source for the 80 percent figure).

    Sources: AFP, republished by Young Journalists Club (YJC), AFP, republished by Hurriyet Daily News

  6. 2015
    Committee decision 39 COM 7B.93 notes measures taken at Bam

    In an omnibus decision covering Bam and one other property, the Committee noted with satisfaction the measures taken to mitigate threats. Other paragraphs of the omnibus decision, addressed to both States Parties concerned, encourage continued conservation efforts and remind them to inform the World Heritage Centre in due course about any major development project. UNESCO's summary of the State Party's March 2015 report says the Centre and advisory bodies judged the State Party to be adequately addressing the state of conservation and no further short-term reporting was required.

    Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre

  7. 2023
    Periodic report and boundary clarification recorded

    UNESCO's file for the property lists the Periodic Reporting Cycle 3 Section II report (2023) and a Committee decision (45 COM 8D, extended 45th session, 2023) taking note of boundary and area clarifications provided for Bam. This is the most recent item in the file; no later state of conservation report or condition decision for Bam appears on the documents page.

    Sources: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO World Heritage Centre (State Party periodic report)

  8. 2026-02-28
    War begins in Iran (regional context, not specific to Bam)

    Al Jazeera reported that the war began on 28 February 2026 when the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran. AP (via PBS) reported that UNESCO verified damage at at least four Iranian locations, none of them Bam. None of the sources read mentions Bam.

    Sources: Associated Press, via PBS NewsHour, Al Jazeera

  9. 2026-03-10
    Strike reported on an unnamed airport in Kerman Province

    Trend attributed to Rahman Jalali, Deputy Governor of Kerman Province, the statement that two passenger aircraft were destroyed when an airport in Kerman Province was struck by the United States and Israel (the article does not give his words in direct quotes). The report does not name the city or airport and does not mention Bam; no link to the property was established.

    Sources: Trend News Agency

Digital Preservation Index

Overall coverage: Moderate — Documented in several categories, with some notable gaps.

Three of five categories have publicly viewable evidence, which gives the moderate tier. Photography includes a UNESCO gallery and a Columbia University before-and-after resource; archival records are the nomination file and UNESCO's reports and decisions; scholarship includes a short research-in-progress conference paper and an encyclopaedia entry. 3D documentation is marked false: a 2007 Eurographics paper reports 3D computer simulation and VR work on the citadel, but no publicly viewable model was found, and a paper describing modelling is not counted as a model. Virtual tour is marked false: a commercial 360-degree panorama page for the Bam Citadel (AirPano) and a Columbia panorama page with a pre-2003 caption were found, but the researcher could not confirm that either viewer rendered, and neither is an official or institutional tour. Coverage is uneven: much visual material predates or immediately follows the 2003 earthquake, and the reviewer may want to confirm whether post-reconstruction documentation exists.

Law and commitments

Sources